2.1 Faculty Meetings
The first meeting in the fall is typically held on the first Friday of classes. The last meeting of the year is held on the Friday morning preceding Commencement. The remaining meetings, of which there are five or six each
semester, will begin at 4:30 p.m. on Thursdays. All full-time faculty members are expected to attend and must be physically present to vote. Part-time faculty may attend faculty meetings but may not vote.
Meetings will be limited to 90 minutes, but can be extended (twice at most) by a ten-minute increment if the majority of the voting members in attendance choose to do so. At the scheduled end time, any voting member can bring a motion to extend the meeting ten minutes beyond its intended close; a second is required, as is a supporting majority to continue business. No debate will be allowed pertaining to this motion. If the motion fails, the moderator will declare the meeting adjourned. If the motion passes, business will continue until adjourned or until a second vote to extend.
The Moderator, charged with setting meeting agendas and guiding the body on the appointed timetable, will attempt to limit critical reports that require significant interrogation or discussion to one per meeting. An annual schedule of recurring reports will establish a timeline for presentations in order to aid advance planning and distribution of business. The faculty Moderator and Secretary will share expectations with agenda participants to facilitate and speed the summary of items distributed for review in advance of the meeting.
Minutes of faculty meetings are posted electronically in advance of the next meeting in order to allow review. If not amended at the next sitting of the Faculty, they are considered approved. Items of major import must be read at two separate sittings
(Revised 11 November 2021, 13 April 2023)
2.2 Faculty Moderator
The Moderator of the Faculty will be a faculty member elected for a three-year term by a vote of the Faculty. According to the College Bylaws, Article XII, Section 2, “The President shall preside at all meetings of the Faculty unless the President designates another to do so.” The Moderator is presumed to be the President’s faculty designee and will therefore preside at all faculty meetings. All full-time faculty members, except members of elected service positions and the Chair of IRB, are eligible to serve as Moderator. Individuals may decline to have their names appear on the first ballot, but faculty whose names appear on the first ballot are expected to serve if elected. Faculty completing three consecutive years of service as Faculty Moderator will not normally be appointed to a committee for two years.
Once elected, the Moderator will be responsible for establishing a schedule for presentations at Faculty Meetings by standing committees, the President, and other administrators. The Moderator will be responsible for working with these groups and individuals to determine and distribute in a timely fashion the agenda for each meeting.
2.2.1 Adding Agenda Items
If an individual faculty member wishes to add an item to the Faculty meeting agenda, they must first go through the relevant committee or Faculty Councl. If the committee or Council decline to take the item forward, and if the faculty member still wishes it to be discussed by the full Faculty, they must submit the item in writing to the Moderator prior to the meeting in which the items will be presented for consideration, confirming that they have already consulted with the relevant committee and/or Faculty Council. In the event that the Moderator determines that the individual has followed the aforementioned procedures, the Moderator will follow the procedures below, and will ensure any relevant materials are available for review.
If a faculty member has brought an item to the Moderator ahead of the meeting, the Moderator will ask at the beginning of the Faculty meeting if there are motions from the floor to add new items to the agenda. At this moment, individuals who have prepared an agenda item in consultation with the Moderator can present their item for consideration by the Faculty.
If a member of the Faculty proposes adding an item to the agenda and this motion is seconded, the Moderator will facilitate a vote by paper ballot. If the motion is supported by at least two-thirds of the Faculty in attendance, the item will be added to the agenda.
The Moderator will accept faculty requests made prior to each meeting to speak on any agenda item, and will actively solicit participation in the debate of faculty who possess the expertise and points of view which they believe will enrich the quality of the discussion. All remarks made during debate will be addressed to the Moderator.
(Fall 2021, Revised 13 April 2023)
2.3 Secretary of the Faculty
The Secretary of the Faculty will be a Faculty member nominated by the Faculty Council and approved by the Faculty. In nominating a Secretary, the Council will take into account seniority and/or record of contributions to the College. An individual may decline Council’s nomination, but an individual who is nominated by Council and affirmed by a vote of the Faculty is expected to serve. Faculty completing three consecutive years of service as Secretary of the Faculty will not normally be appointed to a committee for two years.
The Secretary represents the Faculty at the Commencement Ceremony by participating in the awarding of degrees and affixing their signature to all diplomas. For meetings of the Faculty, the Secretary advises the Moderator in setting the yearly schedule; solicits items of business for each meeting, creates the agenda in consultation with the Moderator, and calls all meetings through advance distribution of the agenda; provides for the distribution of handouts and attachments relevant to the agenda (and the retrieval of unused copies) as necessary; serves as Parliamentarian of the Faculty by ruling on matters relevant to faculty tradition and the order of debate; records the proceedings of each meeting (except executive sessions) in the form of Minutes, posts them along with relevant attachments on the College’s website or at the appropriate venue.
(Fall 2002, Revised Fall 2021, 13 April 2023)
2.4 Faculty Council
The Faculty Council is an elected committee with the functions to advise the President and the Provost in the development of general college policies, advise the President on Honorary Degrees, serve as the Committee on Committees, and consider and deal appropriately with issues brought to it by any member of the college community. See Section 3.1 for the complete charge and description of Faculty Council.
2.5 Standing Committees
Allegheny College is distinguished by its commitment to shared governance. This commitment rests upon three principles:
- We are a community dedicated to a common project: engaging with our students in a liberal education.
- We believe that this common project is best advanced when we draw upon the broad competencies of all members of our community.
- We think that the general direction of the College should be determined by democratic practices and habits.
The commitment to shared governance endows members of the Facuty with rights but also imposes responsibilities. Among the most important are leadership and participation in shaping our common future. The committee system is the principal means through which we realize this commitment.
Faculty members of standing committees are either faculty-elected positions (Faculty Review, Faculty Council) or are appointments that are nominated by Faculty Council and approved by the faculty. Student members are appointed by the student government from a list of student applicants. Faculty members usually are not asked to serve on committees during their first two years at the College, but are eligible for appointment thereafter. Additional information on committees and their membership is available on-line at the College Committees webpage.
2.5.1 General Rules
The Faculty Council will serve as the “Committee on Committees” and will nominate for Faculty consideration and approval persons eligible to fill vacancies on the Standing Committees. Faculty members who have completed at least two years of teaching may be considered eligible for service on a Standing Committee. Faculty in their second year of service will not normally be asked to serve on Standing Committees.
At the end of each semester in which a Faculty member served on a nominated standing committee, they will earn 5 Committee Service Points (CSP). At the end of each semester in which a Faculty member serves on an elected standing committee or as the Faculty Moderator or as the Secretary of the Faculty, they will earn 6 CSP. At the end of each semester every Faculty member will lose 3 CSP (balanced by any they gained) to a minimum of 0 CSP. Following the receipt of the Annual Committee Activities report, Faculty Council will award faculty for each semester they served as chair of that committee with 1 CSP.
Faculty Council will consider institutional needs and current faculty member accumulated CSP to determine appointments to standing committees. Generally, Faculty Council will prioritize nominating faculty members with 0 accumulated CSP at the time of nomination. A record of all CSP will be kept up to date and maintained by Faculty Council and will be shared with the faculty body at the time committee service preferences are requested. Faculty should expect to be relieved of service from a nominated standing committee position following the completion of a semester in which their accumulated CSP is greater than or equal to 12 unless otherwise negotiated with Faculty Council. Faculty who are elected to a standing committee (Faculty Review Committee, Faculty Council) are expected to complete a three year appointment regardless of their accumulated CSP. Members of an elected committee are ineligible for service on another elected committee and may not appear on any ballot for committee election. Persons serving a full, three-year term on an elected committee (Faculty Review Committee, Faculty Council) shall be ineligible for election to either elected committee for three years following the expiration of their terms.
Nomination for elected committee service is an expression of trust and respect. This is especially true for the Faculty Review Committee, as “the award of tenure is the single most important personnel decision the College makes; it must be awarded with the gravest care” (Faculty Handbook Section 5.2.39). Faculty nominated for election in the first round of voting for an elected committee (Faculty Council and Faculty Review) should recognize the institutional importance and professional responsibility of serving on these important committees. Individuals may decline to have their names appear on the first ballot, but faculty whose names appear on the first ballot are expected to serve if elected.
2.5.2 Faculty Election Procedures
There are several elected positions in faculty governance, namely Faculty Council, Faculty Review Committee, and Faculty Moderator. All of these will follow the same election procedures unless otherwise noted in their descriptions.
2.5.2a Procedure Overview
Elections for the positions noted above will be overseen by the current members of Faculty Council. Elections should adheare to the following steps:
- Eligibility and Opt-out Form: Contact the members of the faclty eligible for election, as determined by Faculty Council and the Provost Office. (See eligibility requirements in Section 2.4.2c below). Provide eligible faculty members the option to opt-out of appearing on the first round ballot by responding to Faculty Council within one week of notification.
- First Round Ballot: After the eligible faculty members have had the week-long period to respond, Faculty Council will send out an electronic ballot for the first round of voting. This ballott will include all eligible faculty how have not opted out. Full-time faculty can vote for any number of candidates. The first round ballot will remain open for responses for one week.
- Second Round Ballot: Based on the results of the initial round of voting, Faculty Council will prepare a final ballot listing a number of candidates equal to twice the number of vacancies to be filled through the election. In the cases of ties on the first round ballot, additional candidates may be added to the second round ballot. These candidates will be the top vote earners from the first round ballot. The second round ballot will be sent to all full-time faculty, who can then vote for any number of candidates. The second round ballot will remain open for responses for one week.
- Results: Faculty Council will notify the top vote earners of their election and then notify the entire faculty of the election results. If there is a tie such that a winner cannot be determined, see the procedures for ties in Section 2.5.2b below.
2.5.2b Resolving Ties on Second Round Ballot
In the case where more than one candidate receives the exact same number of votes and that results in having more top voting earners than open positions, a runoff election will occur. Examples where this might happen would be a tie between two or more candidates who have the most votes when there is only one open position, or when there is a tie for second place when there are two open positions.
In the event of a tie such as noted above, Faculty Council will prepare a ballot consisting of only the tied candidates. The ballot will be distributed to all full-time faculty members who will be able to vote for exactly one candidate. The top vote earners will be elected to any remaining positions after resolving the Second Round Ballot.
Generally, all full-time faculty will be eligible for election with the following exceptions:
- Faculty currently serving on an elected faculty position.
- Faculty currently serving as the Chair of the Institutional Reveiw Board.
- Faculty who have completed a full three-year term on an elected position and the final day of that term is within three years of the first round of election.
- Other eligibility criteria as dictated by the position/committee description.
If faculty are appointed in departments that have a traditional academic division affiliation (Humanities, Natural Sciences, Social Sciences), they will normally be considered to be of that division, though they may elect to identify with another division for the purposes of committee assignments. If faculty are appointed in multiple departments with different divisional affiliations, they must choose which division they will represent. If faculty are formally appointed in departments without divisional representation (e.g., interdivisional departments), they must choose which division they will represent. For faculty who are choosing a divisional affiliation, it should be based upon their epistemological point of view as a scholar and teacher. New faculty in the position of choosing a divisional affiliation should do so prior to first commencing committee service, which usually begins in the third year of service. Continuing faculty who wish to change their divisional affiliation, may do so during a hiatus from committee service, i.e., they may not do so while serving on a committee. In order to declare a divisional affiliation other than the default affiliation determine by departmental appointment, Faculty should send a brief memo identifying their divisional affiliation. If approved by Faculty Council, all such declarations will be honored for the purposes of committee assignments. In all cases where a declaration of divisional affiliation needs to be made, it must be made via the Committee Preference Form distributed by Faculty Council at the end of the Spring semester.
2.5.3 Committee Composition
When not specified, faculty membrship on standing committees should, whenever possible, reflect the diversity of perspective, experience, and expertise of members of the College. In cases where divisional representation is specific, at least one faculty member from each division will be nominated. In the exceptional circumstance of there being no eligible faculty from a particular division to serve, Faculty Council will nominate faculty from outside that division to fill the vacancy. This exception will not apply to the Faculty Review Committee.
Students will normally serve two-year terms on committees, but seniors will not be excluded from consideration for committee vacancies.
No faculty member may serve simultaneously on more than one standing committee.
Faculty terms on standing committees begin at the start of the semester in which their appointment begins and end at the start of the semester after the final semester of their appointment. While committee terms do run through the summer months, committee members should only be expected to respond to essential business and may do so electronically. Non-essential business should be delayed until the start of the new semester.
When a faculty member resigns from a committee, the chair of the committee and the chair of Faculty Council should be notified in writing. In the event that a member of an elected committee cannot complete their term and that time constraints make a new election infeasible, Faculty Council will revisit the voting results from the most recent appropriate election to identify the next eligible faculty member with the highest number of votes and will ask that person to serve the remainder of the vacated term.
2.5.4 Committee Operations
Exceptional matters that any committee wishes to call to the attention of the President and/or the Faculty should be brought to the Faculty Council.
All committees, except the Faculty Review Committee, will hear and consider related issues brought to them by any member of the college community.
All committees are responsible for periodically reviewing and updating the charge for their committee. Any changes will be brought to Faculty Council for review and presentation for a vote of the Faculty.
Each standing committee of the Faculty shall maintain a transition file that is accessible only to current committee members and which contains the following items: a report of the work the committee has completed in previous years; a progress report of the committee’s current work; a record of agendas and meeting minutes; relevant correspondences between the committee and members of the College community related to the committee’s work; memoranda explaining the rationales for significant committee decisions; relevant documents and reports that the committee references to accomplish their work; and a signed, written statement that verifies that the out-going and in-coming chair have a completed a transition process at the end of the appropriate academic semester. The in-coming committee Chair shall send the statement verifying the transition between the in-coming and out-going chair to Faculty Council. Faculty Council shall be responsible for verifying that all standing committees have completed this transition.
In extenuating circumstances, committee chairs may request a course release as compensation for chair duties and responsibilities. To be considered for a course release, the faculty member must submit in writing the rationale to the Provost and Faculty Council. After initial consideration of department and program staffing needs, the decision is at the discretion of the Provost in consultation with Faculty Council.
2.5.4a Committee Records and Reports
Unless otherwise stated, the reporting frequency and procedures are:
- An agenda will be established for each meeting and distributed to Committee members in advance of the meeting.
- The Committee will keep minutes of the meeting. Minutes will be submitted electronically to the Merrick Archives to be posted on the committee website for distribution to the college community.
- An annual report will be filed with Faculty Council by September 15 and presented in a fall faculty meeting attachment.
- An annual agenda to outline anticipated committee business for the year will be filed with Faculty Council prior to the September faculty meeting.
2.5.5 Task Forces and Summer Working Groups
Often it will be necessary or convenient for temporary committees to be created by the President, Provost, or Faculty Council. Task forces are a means to achieve a strategic goal that cannot be accomplished, or accomplished as efficiently, within the existing committee structure. They should assist the administration in developing and/or implementing College policies or procedures as part of wider strategic plans or initiatives. They should have finite terms, typically at least one semester to a year, and should involve significant time commitment with regular meetings. Summer working groups, which involve monetary compensation, are created by the President or Provost and operate during the summer months.
For service on a Taskforce created by Faculty Council or with Faculty Council’s consultation, a number of CSP may be awarded to faculty members serving on those committees during a given semester. The number of CSP awarded will be determined by Faculty Council commensurate with the CSP system.
Any faculty member may submit a request to Faculty Council for CSP based on service during a given semester. Any such request must be submitted by the end of the semester following the semester when the service work was completed. Faculty Council’s decision on whether to award service points and how many points to award is final.
(Revised 28 January 2016, 28 April 2018, 14 November 2019, 11 November 2021, 17 March 2022, 13 April 2023)
2.6 Departments, Programs, and Chairs
Within and across the College, departments and programs are organized around a discipline or the intersection of multiple disciplines. The essential function of these units is to draw experts together in areas of scholarly pursuit, fostering collaboration and advocacy. In designing curriculum, in clarifying policies and standards for students, and in representing needs and concerns to the administration of the College, departments and programs are critical to the delivery of the curriculum. So, too, are these disciplinary and interdisciplinary hubs vital centers for scholarship, service, and interaction with the world beyond our campus.
Colleagues within these areas may share modes of instruction, research or performance paradigms, equipment needs, or other matters of mutual concern. They might just as easily debate any or all of the above. In either case, departments and programs serve as venues in which faculty can pursue alignment with peers to advance their work and the interests of their students within Allegheny’s liberal arts context.
Practically speaking, departments and programs are also facilitators of majors and minors as well as advising within those courses of study. They introduce course descriptions and program requirements through the Curriculum Committee, and they schedule course offerings in consultation with the Registrar. Departments are also imparted with great responsibility in recommending faculty candidates for hire, renewal, tenure, and promotion. To these ends a great deal of work is organized at the department level.
2.6.1 Department Chairs
The Chair of a department is the chief academic and administrative officer for that department and is accountable directly to the Provost. They are responsible for the proper functioning of the department with respect to curriculum, facilities, budgets, hiring, faculty development, student concerns, and engagement in the broader community.
The Provost, following consultation with all continuing full time faculty in the department, appoints the Chair for up to a four-year term, which may be renewed for up to one additional four-year term. Selection criteria include: experience in leadership positions; the point in a person’s career with respect to sabbaticals, research plans, etc.; placement of sabbaticals within the department; and tenure status—under normal circumstances only tenured faculty will be asked to serve as Chair of a department. Chairs serve at the pleasure of the Provost, who will evaluate each Chair’s work regularly, and assist when appropriate. Near the end of the first four-year term the Provost, after meeting with continuing full time faculty, will determine if reappointment is mutually desirable.
Under ordinary circumstances, the Chair is relieved of one course per year as compensation for Chair duties and responsibilities. In rare cases, this allowance may increase, at the discretion of the Provost. To be considered for a second course release, the Department Chair must submit in writing the rationale to the Provost. A second course release is not automatically renewed from one academic year to the next, which means the Chair must write each year they believe circumstances warrant a second release. Factors to be considered for increasing the course allowance include departmental size, sabbatical leaves, departmental searches, personnel matters, or other issues that may result in large departmental time demands placed upon the Chair. After initial consideration of department and program staffing needs, the decision is at the discretion of the Provost. If circumstances prohibit a Chair from taking a course reduction, a stipend can be negotiated.
2.6.2 Department Chair Responsibilities
Outlined below is a list of the specific duties of the department Chair. This list is meant to provide direction in administering the responsibilities of this position, which may vary somewhat from department to department. Departments should maintain a list of specific job duties to ensure the smooth operation of departmental business.
- Leadership: The Chair is responsible for fostering a climate of respect, collegiality, and interaction within and among departments so that student learning, faculty development, and programmatic and interdisciplinary successes are fostered and encouraged. Facilitating an ongoing program for long-range planning and innovation, including curriculum, within the department is also the Chair’s responsibility. This plan should reflect balance between departmental goals/mission/needs and those of the College.
- Departmental Representative and Liaison: The Chair acts as the spokesperson in all official transactions with department members, as well as with other members of the college and community-at-large (off-campus contacts). They oversee department policies and practices, guide planning, and serve as the “certifying officer” of the department on official matters. The Chair also facilitates communication with other academic departments and programs where concerted efforts would be of mutual benefit.
- Personnel: The Chair has oversight responsibility for department staff, including technicians, program assistants, and all other personnel whose duty lies within the department. The Chair is the first point of contact and has primary responsibility for mediating conflicts among department staff as well as handling student and parental concerns or complaints. The Chair has principal responsibility for all department personnel searches and serves as the chief coordinator for recruitment into the department; they may delegate this responsibility where appropriate. The Chair should work closely with new faculty to ensure proper orientation to departmental policies. First-year faculty should not be expected to provide academic advising for students or serve as a first reader on senior projects. Exceptions may be made for the senior project, in consultation with the Chair and the Provost. A first-year faculty member may be asked to serve as second or third reader on a small number of senior projects.
- Handling and Keeping of RSE Narratives: All narratives will be sent to the Chair of the faculty member’s home department. If a tenure committee has been formed for a candidate, the Department Chair will be responsible for sharing RSEs with the tenure committee. The Chair should provide copies of narrative evaluations to untenured faculty but must retain the original narratives. Copies of narratives should be provided to tenured faculty upon their request. Narratives should only be destroyed under one of the following circumstances:
- The instructor has left the college and is not expected to return, or
- The instructor has achieved the rank of full professor and at least five years have elapsed since the course was taught.
- Faculty Development and Evaluation: The Chair ensures that the faculty are aware of the department’s expectations and that each faculty member’s own expectations and concerns are addressed when appropriate. Chairs provide opportunities for ongoing conversation with department colleagues about their professional responsibilities and development and shall hold such conversations with tenure-track faculty members annually. The Chair will coordinate all departmental evaluations; and when the college considers faculty for promotion or tenure, the Chair (with contributions from other faculty members as appropriate) will be the primary author of department faculty evaluations. If a promotion or tenure committee has been formed for a candidate, the promotion or tenure committee will be responsible for coordinating and authoring committee evaluations.
- Departmental Meetings: Chairs are responsible for calling regular department meetings; a minimum of three meetings per semester is required. The Chair ensures that agendas are made available to department members and that department business is recorded as appropriate.
- Course Scheduling: The Chair is responsible for organizing class schedules, subject to approval by the Provost. Although the task of actually coordinating schedules may be delegated, untenured faculty members should not be asked to perform this task. It is the Chair’s right to ensure that scheduling burdens are equitably shared by department members, who must be aware that it may be necessary to teach a five-day schedule one semester per year.
- Certifying Minors and Transfer Credit Approval: It is the Chair’s responsibility to certify that requirements for minors have been met and to approve credit for transfer and off-campus courses. Although the task of certifying minors or approving transfer credits may be delegated, primary oversight belongs to the Chair.
- Physical Operations: The Chair is responsible for the general management and oversight of departmental facilities, including office-classroom-lab-studio space and equipment. The Chair should be aware of department needs with respect to facilities, and represent those needs to the administration.
- Budget: The Chair is responsible for planning and maintaining the department operations budget.
- Classroom Observation Policies: Every academic department and program at the College is expected to establish a written policy by which the regular classroom observations of untenured faculty will be conducted by tenured faculty. If a tenure committee has been formed for a candidate, the tenure committee will be responsibility for determining classroom obervation policies for that candidate. Reasons for such a policy are manifold. For the evaluative work tenured faculty must do, direct observation of colleagues’ teaching is an irreplaceable feature of the accurate and fair assessment of pedagogical practice. Formalizing such policies in writing ensures their routine implementation and demonstrates an institutional commitment to teaching that is both thorough-going and equitable.
2.6.3 Classroom Observation Minimum Expectations
Each department’s and program’s specific classroom observation policy should be designed to fit its particular nature—its size, its culture, its pedagogies—but all such policies should be consistent with the following expectations:
- Frequency. Every tenure-track colleague must be observed teaching by at least one tenured colleague each semester, for formative or summative purposes. Every NTTR faculty member must be observed teaching by at least one tenured colleague each semester during their first six years of service. Teaching observation during the first semester of employment may be for formative purposes only. Following their sixth year of service, NTTR faculty should be observed teaching at least once by a tenured colleague in the period prior to their contract renewal. The Department Chair or Tenure Committee Chair is responsible for creating a schedule of observations and communicating that schedule with both the observed faculty member and the observing faculty members.
- Sequence. Classroom observations should happen on two sequential classes or as close together in the calendar as circumstances allow;
- Scheduling. The observed faculty member should help determine the dates of the visits at least a week ahead of time (no surprise visits). If the observed faculty member is visited by more than one tenured colleague in a semester, every effort should be made to minimize clasroom disruption;
- Before-and-after meetings. The observer should meet with the observed colleague both before the class observation sequence to put those classes into context, and afterwards (one day or at most a week after the last observed class). These before-and-after meetings should be understood as occasions during which the colleague being observed can inform the observer about the course in general, what they are trying to accomplish in these particular class meetings, and what they would like the observer to look for. After the classroom visits, the observing faculty member should describe what they observed in the areas the observed faculty member designated beforehand and in other areas where the observer discerned noteworthy strengths and challenges.
- Submission of report. A written report of classroom observations must be submitted to the Department Chair or Tenure Committee Chair by the last day of classes of the semester in which the observation took place. The Chair will then electronically submit the observation(s) to the Provost Office by the end of the semester.
Adjustments to the frequency and submission of reports may be made in exceptional circumstances at the discretion of the Provost in consultation with the tenure-track or NTTR faculty member and the Department Chair or Tenure Committee Chair.
Each classroom observation policy should represent the consensus of the department or program creating them and should be reviewed by the department/program every five years. A copy of a department’s or program’s new policy should be sent to the Provost’s Office. In the spirit of making these documents consistent with the college’s minimum expectations described above, the Provost or their designee may on occasion discuss possible revisions in a department’s or program’s guidelines. Each department/program’s guidelines will also be posted on the Faculty Resources website when available.
(Spring 2002, Revised Spring 2004, Spring 2011. 2 March 2012, 14 November 2019, 11 November 2021, 27 April 2023)
2.7 Faculty Input into the Reappointment of the Provost
The Provost serves at the pleasure of the President and may be reappointed for one or more subsequent terms. If the Provost is to be considered for reappointment, faculty input about their performance shall be collected by Faculty Council during the fall of the final year of the Provost’s current appointment. By September 15, Council shall solicit written input from all department chairs and program directors and also invite letters from any other faculty members, including non-tenure track and part-time faculty. All faculty input into the review process must be submitted to Council by October 1. Council shall then review, discuss, and share its findings during a meeting with the President by October 15. The contents of all letters and other communications will be treated as confidential by both Council and the President. This process shall be discontinued if the Provost indicates that they do not wish to be considered for reappointment.
(Created 9 March 2012, Revised 13 April 2023)
2.8 Faculty Input into the Reappointment of Deans, Associate Deans, and Associate Provosts of the College
The President or the Provost will consult with Faculty Council before reappointing a Dean, Associate Dean, or Associate Provost of the College.
(Created 9 March 2012, Revised Spring 2019, 13 April 2023)